Growing up I struggled
greatly with comprehension. I never could remember what I just read, and 90% of
the time I would read a page and at the end I had no idea what I just read. The
Tompkins book mentions the importance of Fluency when reading and trying to
comprehend the material that you are reading. Fluency is so important because
readers are able to recognize words that they are reading automatically, read
with expression and at a fluent speed. This helps readers understand the
information they are reading because they do not have to focus on pronouncing
words and decoding sentences. This is one reason why I was so poorly with
comprehension because I struggled reading books fluently. I was the kid that
read word by word until the fifth grade.
Also, mentioned in the
Tompkins book are different comprehension levels. I would definitely say that
depending on the type of book and the difficulty of the book affects what level
my comprehension is at. For example, the first level, literal comprehension is
when “readers pick out main ideas, sequence details, notice similarities and
differences, and identify explicitly stated reasons” (Tompkins, pg 257). I
would say if I am reading a challenging book or a text book for school that I
do not quiet understand I am only able to reach this level of comprehension if
I am lucky. The second level is inferential comprehension. This is when
“readers use clues in the text, implied information and their background
knowledge to draw inferences. They make predictions, recognize cause and
effect, and determine the author’s purpose” (Tompkins, pg 258) I would say that
I usually have inferential comprehension when reading my education books, I am
trying to understand what the author is saying and what purpose he has. I also
draw on a lot of my own experiences to help myself relate to the information
that is being shared. The last level is crucial comprehension “readers analyze
symbolic meanings, distinguish fact from opinion, and draw conclusions”
(Tompkins, pg 258). I find myself often having this level of comprehension when
I am reading a book for fun, I am drawn into the book constantly trying to make
conclusions and understand different symbolic meanings. I think that the level
of comprehension definitely goes hand and hand with the level of the text you
are reading and if you are able to read the text fluently and if you find the
book enjoyable and the information pulling you into the book and wanting to
keep reading more.
My
students are currently reading a Greek gods book, all the students are very
engaged and interested in this book. They try to find any time that they can
throughout the day to continue reading. Not only is the book engaging but also
often my mentor teacher elicits group conversations over what they just read.
Like mentioned in the Applegate article she asks higher order questions and
pushes her students to engage in the book and develop a deep understanding.
With having many group discussions over this book and allowing the students to
explore their own questions and thoughts with the books keep the students
engage. Also, this helps some students that are struggling a little to
understand the book to review the information they just read. By having
students listening to how other students paraphrase the chapter that was just
read is a great review for all students. Also, what is great is that my mentor
teacher has the students draw pictures that summarize each chapter that they
read. By drawing the pictures it forces the students to think of the main
information that took place in that specific chapter. This is difficult for
some students to be able to pick out the main topic instead of a couple small
events that took place in the book. One
section that I really enjoyed reading in the Applegate article was the
different types of profiles in comprehension. My classroom has a wide range of students’
levels of reading and their levels of comprehension. There are a couple of
students that are the “fuzzy thinkers” where they cannot directly answer a
question and just provide very basic simple answers. It is clear that they did
not totally understand the information that they read because when trying to
ask more in depth questions they often are not able to provide an answer. I
also have a couple of students that are dodgers; I never realized that they
fell within a category. When they have an short answer they have to write on a
test or a questions provided in a discussion often the students will provide a
very detailed answer however it did not answer the specific question. The
student will change the question, sometimes just slightly so that they are able
to answer the questions correctly because they were unaware of the initial
question. These readings have provided
me with a new incite onto how to best help my students become better at
comprehending the text and how to word questions and discussion in a way to
elicit the best responses and involvement from students.